Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47716 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2003 12:52:54 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2003 12:52:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 14086 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2003 12:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 14033 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2003 12:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13968 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2003 12:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2003 12:52:28 -0000 Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1066049547895; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:52:27 +0200 Received: from WRPO (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.140]) by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h9DCqQ831954 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:52:27 +0200 From: "Reinhard Poetz" To: Subject: RE: [ANN] The cocoon-2.2 CVS repository is setup Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:51:58 +0200 Message-ID: <002201c39188$cb8c1180$1e01a8c0@WRPO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: Stefano Mazzocchi > cvs checkout cocoon-2.2 > > gives you the brand new CVS repository. I did manual surgery and I > removed: > > - blocks > - documentation > - the attic for the /lib > - scratchpad > > (and we went from 148 to 32 Mb!) Cool! What rules do we have now? - the development of blocks (e.g. portal, ...) is done in the 2.1 rep until the new block management system can be considered as stable - all bugfixes to the core go into 2.2, 2.1 and if necessary in 2.0 - everything that changes things fundamentally is done in 2.2 - block development - changes to the environment - virtual sitemap components - move to Fortress - intercepted flowscript --> This also means that no vote is needed for any changes as 2.2 is alpha! I know we've discussed this several times but I want to make the rules clear for everybody. Is this okay - you only need to answer if it is not ;-) Reinhar