cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira>
Subject Re: Forrest docs in old format.
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:11:42 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

>Upayavira wrote:
>>I get the CLI to generate /docs/index.html and follow links. If it 
>>generates the whole site, it gives me a good idea as to how it is 
>>working, and how fast it is working.
>>It isn't the best test method, as there are features of the CLI that 
>>this isn't testing - e.g. link rewriting. I can see that I need a more 
>>targetted test suite, aimed to show up flaws in these features.
>>One reason why I haven't done this because I haven't worked out how to. 
>>Should I just create a sample, or I guess I could add my tests to 
>>src/webapp/tests/. And have a cli-test.xconf somewhere that can be used 
>>to run the tests. (I would like to come up with a way to automate the 
>>checking of the results, but for the time being, checking the resulting 
>>pages will be a manual process).
>>Does all this make sense? The better the idea - the easier it'll be for 
>>me to implement.
>>Until we've done this, the docs is all I have!
>Now, perhaps I did get something wrong, but as far as I understand
>you, you are using the CLI and generate the whole site from the 
>docs directory. But this has nothing to do with the docs directory
>in the build\webapps directory, or am I wrong?
No, to use the CLI, I need a webapp, just like the servlet. And to test 
the CLI, I need a webapp with some pages in it. Therefore, I use the 
docs in the webapp (build/webapp/docs/) to test it.

>Even if you would use that directory as your source you can
>use the src\docs directory.
We could configure the webapp\docs to use src\docs which would avoid 
some copying, but I'm not sure if that really helps us all that much.

Clearer now?

Regards, Upayavira

View raw message