Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> On Friday, Oct 17, 2003, at 20:36 Europe/Rome, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>> Anyone have a logical view of how the Treebuilder is supposed to work?
>> It would
>> definitely help me in refactoring things. As it is now, the
>> Treebuilder is
>> tightly integrated with the ECM, so it is something that won't work right
>> away... I am just trying to get to a place where I can compile 2.2 so
>> that my
>> testcases will run and I can verify what I am doing works.
>
>
> Sylvain knows this and, AFAIK, he's one of the few (only?) that does.
>
> Which is also something that I'm particularely comfortable with, even if
> this is not clearly Sylvain's fault if what he writes works as expected
> and nobody has to go there and fix it ;-)
>
> But a description of the internals of the tree processor would be
> helpful not only for migration for also for future reference (refactor?
> cleanup? profile? whatever)
I am slowly getting up to speed, and I will eventually get there. The
important thing is to grok the big picture, which will help me with the
details.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
|