cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <>
Subject Re: block perspectives
Date Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:30:55 GMT

Stephen McConnell wrote:

> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>  3) how open are you/avalon to changes to this DTD?
> Totally open.
> However, a better question is how reasonable is it to extend the 
> deployment and composition object model instances.  This implies 
> implementation of readers and writers that capture domain specific 
> (e.g. Cocoon value-added content) together with the underlying Avalon 
> structures.  Readers and writers currently include XML and serialized 
> forms.  In principal an extended form will be possible - and more to 
> the point - will be required independently of Cocoon specific 
> requirements simply to meet evolutionary needs in our object model.
> I.e. think in terms of meta-model class extension - as opposed to DTD 
> proliferation. 

Here are the links to the immutable serializable meta-data classes that 
should be extended:
 From here the next subject focusses on linking in a custom model 
defintion that implements the following:



Stephen J. McConnell

View raw message