cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Timothy Larson <timlarsonw...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [Woody] why the binding load and save was removed from Form ?
Date Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:28:48 GMT
--- Marc Portier <mpo@outerthought.org> wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > And also, considering the very unique features of the Form class 
> > compared to other widgets, I'm wondering if it should be a widget at all.
> 
> binding itself benefits from the implied 'composite' pattern this 
> approach is introducing
> 
> care to share more practical reasons to change it?
> 
> (pls understand: I'm open to changing it, but if we do, I would like us 
> to keep the composite pattern allive by introducing some 
> wrapping/wrapped widget that holds all the widgets of the form?)

I have written a "Struct" widget that would fill this need for a composite
pattern, but I do not yet have an opinion on the question of whether the form
should be a widget or not.

Expect a patch set pretty soon for "Struct", "Union", "Class", and "New" widgets.

--Tim Larson


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

Mime
View raw message