cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>
Subject Track feature requests in bugzilla? (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10203] - Docs referenced by XSLT's document() are not included in cache validity)
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:42:59 GMT
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 19:28, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10203>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10203
> 
> Docs referenced by XSLT's document() are not included in cache validity
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From cziegeler@apache.org  2003-10-08 17:28 -------
> Ah, ok you're right. Although I guess that it's technical possible it will get 
> even more messy than the whole caching code is already.
> In my opinion, it's sufficient to document this behaviour. Users can take care 
> of it - if they know.
> 
> On the other hand, I think this is more a feature request than a bug. So I 
> suggest to add this to our feature request page at the wiki and close this bug.
> Or you can start a vote if this is more a bug or more a feature request first.

I agree it's a feature request and added it to the wiki page. However,
can't we use bugzilla also to track (serious) feature requests? There
are a couple of other "enhancement" requests in there, should we also
close them and add them to the wiki page?

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org                          bruno@apache.org


Mime
View raw message