Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50708 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 22:27:56 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 22:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 45354 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 45331 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 45318 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 22:27:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 22:27:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26161 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 22:27:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?217.158.110.71?) (217.158.110.71) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 22:27:41 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:27:41 +0100 Subject: Re: OXF rebuttal (was: Re: Interesting comparison) From: Pier Fumagalli To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 17/9/03 11:43, "Stefano Mazzocchi" wrote: > They do a much better marketing service for us if they keep up that > lame page ;-) +1. ANY advertisement is good advertisement! :-) Plus, it proves they're scared shitless of what Cocoon can offer... > [oh, look, they support Java Server Faces.... (sound of Stefano puking)] Isn't the last word in "Java Server Faces" spelled with two "E"s ? :-) Pier