Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79375 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 21:56:39 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 21:56:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 82941 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2003 21:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82880 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2003 21:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82860 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 21:56:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sati.virbus.de) (145.253.246.81) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 21:56:21 -0000 Received: from sati.virbus.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F1134166A7A for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:56:27 +0200 (MEST) Received: from virbus.de (Bd878.pppool.de [213.7.216.120]) by sati.virbus.de (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2E214166A79 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:56:27 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <3F7758E3.8080109@virbus.de> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:55:47 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Build infrastructure References: <2A3CDA39-EF43-11D7-AD24-000393D2CB02@apache.org> <3F773DA9.7000503@virbus.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Giacomo Pati wrote: >> >>>3) Maven >>> ATM this is my preferred build infrastructure and I could help >>> building the 2.2 repo based on it >> >>Heard interesting things it (besides the opinion that there is nearly no ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ >>documentation ;-) ), so +1 from here too. Jelly/Maven seem to bring the >>necessary flexibility into Ant. > > > What do you mean with 'there is nearly no documentation'? About Maven > itself? I've found the web site and other resources quite enough to > start using it for sever projects now. What do you miss? See above. I didn't have a look on it myself. It was about Maven and especially Jelly. And as far Maven uses Jelly ... Joerg