Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-47835-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 205 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 05:24:13 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 05:24:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 84229 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2003 05:23:47 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 84174 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2003 05:23:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 84158 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 05:23:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stud4.tuwien.ac.at) (193.170.75.21)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 05:23:47 -0000
Received: from student.tuwien.ac.at (chello212186106081.14.tuwien.teleweb.at
 [212.186.106.81])
	by stud4.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.3 (PHNE_26304)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA19612
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:23:57 +0200 (METDST)
Message-ID: <3F6A92E6.8010205@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:23:50 +0200
From: Andreas Hochsteger <e9625392@student.tuwien.ac.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030612
X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: OXF rebuttal
References: <MHEELOCNACIDACGCPOBGKEAPCHAA.jefe182@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <MHEELOCNACIDACGCPOBGKEAPCHAA.jefe182@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi Jeff!

I have to agree with you.
I fact I just posted similar statements before reading your's - just in 
case somebody thinks I'm repeating you ;-)

Jeff Ramsdale wrote:

> Chiming in on Stefano's comments...
> 
> I think Erik and Orbeon deserve credit for accepting this list's corrections
> and updating their page. And don't forget that they have every right to sell
> their product and support services. It might be worth occasionally looking
> at OXF and saying, "Yeah, that's a good feature--we should add that to
> Cocoon." Clearly they've looked at Cocoon in developing their feature
> set--surely it would be pure arrogance to think they are incapable of
> developing their own good ideas. Competition is good for innovation! And
> finally, ultimately Cocoon doesn't really HAVE to compete because there's no
> money on the line for us if someone chooses OXF instead, so no worries...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Roger I Martin PhD [mailto:hypernexdev@hypernexinc.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:16 PM
>>To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: OXF rebuttal
>>
>>
>>Hi Erik,
>>
>>I don't see any "In the works" or "Upcoming" on the Cocoon column of the
>>comparison.
> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
>