Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84481 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 16:45:45 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 16:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 6446 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 16:19:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 6314 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 16:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 6241 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 16:19:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host.leverageweb.com) (64.91.232.157) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 16:19:54 -0000 Received: from dhcp205059.hq.af.mil ([134.205.205.59] helo=leverageweb.com) by host.leverageweb.com with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19uaJf-000757-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:17:07 -0400 Message-ID: <3F5614AA.2090400@leverageweb.com> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:19:54 -0400 From: Geoff Howard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Migrate from the aging ECM References: <3F55ED13.5080601@apache.org> <3F55FD54.5070805@leverageweb.com> <3F5602D8.8010800@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3F5602D8.8010800@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.leverageweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cocoon.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - leverageweb.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Loritsch wrote: > Geoff Howard wrote: > >> Berin Loritsch wrote: >>> >>> In Cocoon/ECM we have the following constructs: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Without a .roles file would we even have declarations that look like >> this? > > :) That IS with the ECM roles file. Sorry, snipped the wrong part - the examples which followed were what I was looking at. > However, with Fortress, you may be able to use a ROLEs file--but it > won't be > necessary. The meta info is part of the class, so there is only one > place you > need to manage it (with the component implementation class). The meta-info > collection process will allow Fortress to automatically collect info > from other > JARs for the available components--which means there won't need to be > any cludgy > "user-roles" attributes any more. Things just work. Great - I think we're all looking forward to this. I'm trying to get a handle on upgrade path for current users. Sounds like we could acheive drop-in support for the old cocoon.xconf format complete with my.roles etc. but could switch the default cocoon.xconf (or whatever it would be then called) to the newer format? Geoff