Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18002 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 11:34:46 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 11:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 73516 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 11:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 73338 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 11:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 73215 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 11:34:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 11:34:25 -0000 Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB08D16F0CC for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.150 ([10.202.2.150] helo=mail.messagingengine.com) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 07:34:22 -0400 X-Epoch: 1062588862 X-Sasl-enc: tsa3IlMvDeDodZdyM8KQIw Received: from upaya.co.uk (elfriedeholmes.demon.co.uk [80.177.165.206]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BF716F108 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F55D137.7090604@upaya.co.uk> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:32:07 +0100 From: Upayavira User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >Thanks to Bruno we have a solution (or workaround) >for the CommandManager problem. Great! > >So afaik we don't have another blocker for the 2.1.1 release. > >As I'm going on vacation starting saturday (yeah), I propose >to do the release this friday. > >The alternatives are: >- someone else does the release in the next three weeks >- or we wait until i'm back > >I think the description on the wiki for doing a release is very >good (I use it each time myself ;) ), so if someone is volunteering, >I'm fine with that as well of course. > > >Carsten > > +1