Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80805 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 16:40:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 16:40:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 81825 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 16:12:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 81746 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 16:12:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 81660 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 16:12:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 16:12:33 -0000 Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1062605548682; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:12:28 +0200 Received: from WRPO (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.195]) by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h83GCS712968 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:12:28 +0200 From: "Reinhard Poetz" To: Subject: RE: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:12:17 +0200 Message-ID: <000c01c37236$257f0e30$1e01a8c0@WRPO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Andrew Savory > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steven Noels wrote: > > > IMHO, it's simply unworkable to have major stuff going on in one > > module, over two branches, at the same time. > > In CVS, I've always found branches == pain. > > I appreciate a move to something like subversion is quite a > revolution, and I'd suggest it's something best kept for the > next "revolution" in Cocoon (like the jump from 1.x to 2.x). > > But I'd really like to see a 2.2 module created now. Should > we put it to a vote? I'm +1 on Carstens original suggestion (create a 2.2 repository with as less as possible code duplication and an enhanced 2.2 build system that can include 2.1 blocks) Cheers, Reinhard