Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42703 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2003 14:38:22 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2003 14:38:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 49526 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2003 14:38:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 49474 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2003 14:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 49454 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2003 14:38:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2003 14:38:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 42616 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2003 14:37:58 -0000 Received: from mgate.at.efp.cc (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2003 14:37:58 -0000 Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1062945441356; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:37:21 +0200 Received: from WRPO (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.199]) by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h87EbI724153 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:37:19 +0200 From: "Reinhard Poetz" To: Subject: RE: JavaScript actions Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:37:02 +0200 Message-ID: <000201c3754d$83104900$c7506bc2@WRPO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <20030907141950.GA3621@wlkp.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: Leszek Gawron > I have also found that even though the feature of calling > actions from flow was mentioned it is not included in cocoon. > Is it on purpose? I think no particiular reason - we talked much about it but nobody implemented it. Reinhard