cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <>
Subject Re: The granularity of continuations
Date Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:36:00 GMT
Christopher Oliver wrote:

> Ok, ok. I've checked in an implemention of arguments.continuation into 
> the Rhino cvs on  Please test it and let me know if 
> it's ok.  If so, someone can go ahead and update the cocoon cvs.

Chris, I don't know what's your state of mind about this (we already had 
communication problems in the past), but I'd like to make it clear that 
I don't want to impose anything. I simply had problems understanding the 
real behaviour of continuations, and this "new Continuation()" was part 
of these problems. I would have been happier with some agreement from 
you, rather than a simple "ok, ok" that makes me think you were bored by 
my remarks.

I also would like some feedback from other non-Schemers around there to 
know their feelings about this. Or am I the only one that digged so deep 
in the flowscript internals ?


Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies 
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance  -

View raw message