cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Proposal a new OJB block
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:07:09 GMT
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:

> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> hi:
>> Please vote about this proposal:
> Antonio,
> there's no need to vote in order for you to add code into CVS. Just go 
> ahead and commit. :-) 

Yeah. Just do it ;-)

> This said, this is not a vote but a few questions:
> 1. I still don't see why it shouldn't be part of the database block. I 
> understand that dealing with databases directly (manual SQL) or 
> through a persistence layer is somewhat different, but then again, 
> with the _current_ blocks, I don't quite see the need for 
> "balkanization" of database handling stuff;

Mmmh... the current database block is related to direct SQL-access, 
which is what OJB wants to hide. So I would go for another block, even 
more considering that it brings new jars that you don't need when using 
e.g. ESQL.


Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies 
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance  -

View raw message