Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> All right, what the hell, you are right, let's move out of the "impasse".
I thought we'd come to some agreement that no option was without
problems but that splitting to a separate cocoon-2.2 module was probably
the least bad option.
> let's do a quick poll: who would be absolutely against using Subversion
> for the Cocoon 2.2 tree (granted that we can safely import the existing
> CVS tree into it)?
>
> state your reasons and try to be as less inertial and defensive on your
> status quo as possible.
Did Niclas' comment about the unreleased status kill this?
Geoff
|