cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Antonio Gallardo" <agalla...@agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Proposal a new OJB block
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:09:22 GMT
Sylvain Wallez dijo:
> Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
>> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>> hi:
>>>
>>> Please vote about this proposal:
>>
>>
>> Antonio,
>>
>> there's no need to vote in order for you to add code into CVS. Just go
>>  ahead and commit. :-)
>
>
> Yeah. Just do it ;-)
>
>> This said, this is not a vote but a few questions:
>>
>> 1. I still don't see why it shouldn't be part of the database block. I
>>  understand that dealing with databases directly (manual SQL) or
>> through a persistence layer is somewhat different, but then again,
>> with the _current_ blocks, I don't quite see the need for
>> "balkanization" of database handling stuff;
>
>
> Mmmh... the current database block is related to direct SQL-access,
> which is what OJB wants to hide. So I would go for another block, even
> more considering that it brings new jars that you don't need when using
> e.g. ESQL.

Yep. You answer this better than me! :-D

The same apply when we will use Hibernate or other related technology.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo




Mime
View raw message