cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Reinhard Poetz" <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject RE: on better release and version management
Date Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:55:01 GMT

From: Stefano Mazzocchi
 
> On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 17:29 Europe/Rome, Reinhard 
> Poetz wrote:
> 
> >
> > From: Stefano Mazzocchi
> >
> >> On Tuesday, Sep 23, 2003, at 22:38 Europe/Rome, Berin 
> Loritsch wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would highly recommend steering away from the use of the word 
> >>> certified unless you intend to establish a standards body 
> to oversee
> >> an official
> >>> certification process.
> >>
> >> Good point. "Supported" sounds less marketing intrusive.
> >>
> >> comments?
> >
> > What happens if we find out that a certain block is not 
> supported any 
> > more (technology outdated, we have a better block, any active
> > developers) *after* we marked it as supported. The first question I 
> > had was "how long does supported mean"? The former proposed 
> > *certified* relates to a certain point of time without saying 
> > something about the future.
> >
> > Another point is that Cocoon is open source and nobody can 
> be forced 
> > to support a single line of code ...
> >
> > Maybe we can find a word that relates to a point of time 
> and does not 
> > have all the meanings "certified" has (see Berin's mail
> > 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106434951718170&w=2)
> 
> official?

+1

Reinhard


Mime
View raw message