Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 34532 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2003 13:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 34516 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 13:53:16 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 13:53:16 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 37C87C7B41 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.46]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003080615531609:18577 ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:53:16 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Fixing blocking bug 9835 for release Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:55:18 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3F31026D.7020202@anyware-tech.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 06.08.2003 15:53:16, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 06.08.2003 15:53:16, Serialize complete at 06.08.2003 15:53:16 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >we have (at least) one blocking bug, I think: > > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9835 > > > >which should be fixed before the release. > > > >This bug is related to the TreeProcessor. I could assume doing a > quick hack and changing the current impl from a list to a tree > like structure (whatever that means), but I'm not sure if this is > a good choice. > > > >Anyone (Sylvain perhaps) a better idea? > > > > Will have a look at it... > Great, thanks! Carsten