Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86880 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 12:42:15 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 12:42:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 79592 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2003 12:42:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 79547 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2003 12:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 79529 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 12:42:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 12:42:00 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id BB053CBFBC for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:08:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.46]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003082914083500:13737 ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:08:35 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Releasing 2.1.1? Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:10:50 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1062158450.14372.175.camel@yum.ot> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 29.08.2003 14:08:35, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 29.08.2003 14:08:36, Serialize complete at 29.08.2003 14:08:36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bruno Dumon wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems > > to make sense. > > > > I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the > > scheduling (CommandManager) problem fixed in the release. Is anyone > > working already on it? > > Not over here. If all else fails, we could disable the CommandManager > and let the ContinuationsManager start a thread of its own (like e.g. > the StoreJanitor does). > We could simply switch back to the cornerstone scheduler which works. Carsten