Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67550 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 15:35:54 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 15:35:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 89992 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2003 15:35:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 89915 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2003 15:35:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 89870 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 15:35:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out005.verizon.net) (206.46.170.143) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 15:35:32 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([139.85.116.155]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030829153441.CHKV15786.out005.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:34:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3F4F728F.2050203@verizon.net> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:34:39 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [139.85.116.155] at Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:34:40 -0500 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... > Ok, great. Does anybody have a problem with the proposed file system > layout? AFAIU, blocks are expanded into WEB-INF/blocks/\d+/ directories: > the file system layout (relative to the cocoon webapp context) is > > [-] WEB-INF > L___ [-] blocks > L___ [-] 384938958499 > | L___ [-] BLOCK-INF > | | L___ block.xml > | L_ (the contents of cob:mycompany.com/webmail/1.3.43) Why temp directory is not used here? And, where unpacked blocks are stored? Vadim