Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <3F4E667A.9030405@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:30:50 -0400
From: Berin Loritsch <bloritsch@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] Starting 2.2
References: <20030828195303.92935.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
 <3F4E6362.8020104@yahoo.de>
In-Reply-To: <3F4E6362.8020104@yahoo.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

J.Pietschmann wrote:

> Timothy Larson wrote:
> 
>> I also wondered about Subversion when the repositories started 
>> multiplying :)
>> Is this a possibility?  Is there a good CVS->Subversion repository 
>> converter?
> 
> 
> What's "good"? The Subversion project has a converter, last time
> I checked they said it still can't convert branches, and that this
> was *the* killer for declaring SVN to be "production ready". Trunk
> only CVS repositories seem to work for a long time already
> (disclaimer: gathered from various messages, I didn't try personally).

Hmm.  Do we still have a test server available?

The last time I played with SVN, the Windows client was a bit buggy.
However that was roughly a year ago.  I'm sure it has gotten better
since then.


-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                 - Benjamin Franklin