Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 95363 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2003 15:17:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 95293 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 15:17:17 -0000 Received: from pop018pub.verizon.net (HELO pop018.verizon.net) (206.46.170.212) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 15:17:17 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([139.85.116.155]) by pop018.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030814151719.SMOK11703.pop018.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:17:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3F3BA7FA.4040402@verizon.net> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:17:14 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Views for readers References: <3F3B9B52.2040907@anyware-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <3F3B9B52.2040907@anyware-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop018.verizon.net from [139.85.116.155] at Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:17:18 -0500 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Le Jeudi, 14 ao� 2003, � 15:53 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a �crit : >> >>> ...But shouldn't we keep labels that are already used into pipelines >>> ? E.g : >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> If it's this way I'd prefer "unless-label" in map:read to make it clear. >> >> Or maybe >> >> >> >> would do, meaning "use this unless any views are requested" >> (and * would be the only allowed value). >> >>> Ah, and this is very easily implementable ;-) >> >> >> >> Quickquick, do it before the FS police hears us ;-) >> >> Seriously, I find this useful for indexing and other purposes >> (gettting meta-information about binary files, images, etc for example). > > > > Me too. But since is a change in the sitemap syntax, we should have a > vote on this. > > Any other proposal or opinion on this subject before we start a vote ? Can't you just enable generators in map:view in case when view starts with reader? Vadim