Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 9783 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2003 15:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 9725 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2003 15:46:44 -0000 Received: from out001pub.verizon.net (HELO out001.verizon.net) (206.46.170.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2003 15:46:44 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([139.85.116.155]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030813154646.PEIX12592.out001.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:46:46 -0500 Message-ID: <3F3A5D64.3040805@verizon.net> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:46:44 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Starting 2.2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [139.85.116.155] at Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:46:46 -0500 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>... >> >> >> >>>Hmm, yes, but we could start the 2.2 repo with the current core source, >>>so we have a starting point. I expect that blocks will require longer >>>discussions and I personally don't want to wait with 2.2 for this. >>> >>> >>> >>I'm wondering. What are you personally planning which requires 2.2 repo >>and can not be done in the current repo? >> >>/me feels that you are trying to solve some problem without stating what >>the problem is >> >> >> >Secret plans something like "world domination" ... :) (just kidding) > >I have several smaller RTs that require major changes in the core, so I >think they are targetted for a 2.2 release rather than 2.1.1. And the >blocks require a major version change, so I thought about merging them. > >I will write the RTs as soon as we have the repository. > Let's do the other way around -- send in RT first and let's hear about those major changes :) Vadim