Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 62354 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2003 12:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 62337 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2003 12:56:13 -0000 Received: from grunt26.ihug.com.au (203.109.249.146) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2003 12:56:13 -0000 Received: from p181-apx1.syd.ihug.com.au (expresso.localdomain) [203.173.140.181] by grunt26.ihug.com.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ne7o-0008WV-00; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:56:12 +1000 Received: from jeff by expresso.localdomain with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19neFa-0001gH-00 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:04:14 +1000 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:04:14 +1000 From: Jeff Turner To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Sitemap versioning? Message-ID: <20030815130414.GA4973@expresso.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, In Cocoon 2.0, the sitemap used this namespace: In 2.1, we changed the sitemap syntax in backwards-incompatible ways, but the namespace is still the same, rather making a mockery of the '/1.0'. I think this happened because when the backwards-incompatible change was made, everyone said "relax, Cocoon is alpha, we'll change it when things are stable"; and then everyone promptly forgot. So when next we tinker with the syntax, can we up the version number sooner rather than later? :) --Jeff