Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-46478-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32758 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2003 06:02:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32745 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2003 06:02:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ironclad.saurik.com) (209.224.199.200)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2003 06:02:34 -0000
Received: from cruiser (ip68-6-89-251.sb.sd.cox.net [68.6.89.251])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ironclad.saurik.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h7H62nhT001716
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:02:51 -0500
Message-ID: <043b01c36484$b9dc2960$fb590644@cruiser>
From: "Jay Freeman \(saurik\)" <saurik@saurik.com>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
References: <JEEHIKKPLIOONJFDJFILKEAOCAAA.sgchance@nps.navy.mil>
 <3F3EAE5D.8060501@leverageweb.com> <03da01c36449$f3c43c20$fb590644@cruiser>
 <03f301c36455$334455a0$fb590644@cruiser> <3F3EE735.1060802@leverageweb.com>
 <042001c36476$7151f160$fb590644@cruiser> <3F3F1064.6020709@outerthought.org>
Subject: Re: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon 2.1
 Released - binary??)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:59:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0
	tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,
	      USER_AGENT_OE
	version=2.43
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Steven:

Ooo... I actually noticed in the last few hours that subsitemaps inherit the
parent's component definitions (was trying to figure out Chaperon for doing
syntax highlighting of my Subversion repositories, and was reading through
its sample's sitemap). That _could_ help me with the hosting half of the
issue, as well as the "my sitemap looks cluttered" part, as I could have
everyone's actual sitemap be a subsitemap of something I hide away from them
in WEB-INF. To see you mention it as something you do pushes it up the list
on things I need to look into today :). Thanks.

Sincerely,
Jay Freeman (saurik)
saurik@saurik.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Noels" <stevenn@outerthought.org>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: Config File Proposal (was... sort of...: [ANN] Apache Cocoon
2.1 Released - binary??)


> Jay Freeman (saurik) wrote:
>
> > Are you recommending that I do all of my development as a patch to a
sitemap
> > rather than as a sitemap,
>
> It won't help you ATM, but for the xconf, that's the way we work with
> Cocoon on our projects... the project sitemap however is mounted as a
> subsitemap, and contains explicit definitions for all components
> relevant to that project.
>
> </Steven>
> --
> Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
> Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
> stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org