Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <000f01c361d1$12603560$3c01a8c0@jdmobile>
From: "JD Daniels" <jd@datatrio.com>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
References: <LKENJPKDAIKAPKHEOCMMAEEKEKAA.cziegeler@s-und-n.de>
 <3F38C0EF.5080209@outerthought.org> <003801c360f1$19a192f0$3c01a8c0@jdmobile>
 <20030812155804.GA10212@managesoft.com>
Subject: Re: 2.1 Build Question
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:28:23 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yes the time is correct on my machine. without changing anything, it built
fine this morning with no errors. Just thought it was odd.

JD


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Crafter" <crafterm@managesoft.com>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: 2.1 Build Question


> Hi JD,
>
> Is the date on your machine correct? This happens quite often when your
> systems' date is behind and files (created on another system) appear to
> be newer.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marcus
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:45:11AM -0800, JD Daniels wrote:
> > I just got the 2.1 release.. and in my build output, there are many many
> > warnings for
> >
> > Modified in the future.
> >
> > What does this mean?
> >
> > JD
>
> --
>         .....
>      ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
>     ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
>     $:         $$$$:   ManageSoft GmbH
>      $       o_)$$$:   82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
>      ;$,    _/\ &&:'   60327 Frankfurt Germany
>        '     /( &&&
>            \_&&&&'
>           &&&&.
>     &&&&&&&:
>