cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geoff Howard <>
Subject Re: [RT] Starting 2.2 (was going to be "The Project Formerly Known As Cocoon")
Date Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:47:06 GMT
Tony Collen wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>> Maybe start 2.5, just to be in line with Linux? ;-P
> Screw that, let's just skip a couple major versions, everyone's doing it 
> now, how does "Cocoon 5.0" look? :)
> Better yet, let's just change the name alltogether:
> Cocoon XP
> Cocoon MX
> Cocoon MX 2004
> I just love Macromedia, at least they admit MX doesn't mean anything:
> What does "MX" mean?
>     The "MX" moniker is not an acronym and doesn't have a literal 
> translation.

What about renaming the next release to an unpronounceable set of 
symbols, like Prince, or that Led Zepplin album?  I'd suggest "!&#".

> In all seriousness, I'm all for 2.2, but what sorts of loose ends are 
> there that could be tied up for 2.1.x?  Howabout a push to clear out 
> some bugs from bugzilla?

Me too, but a push for bug fix (and I'd like to see a docs blitz) 
wouldn't need to hold up creating the repository and working out the 
best way of working two trees at once would it?

By the way, I thought we were planning on breaking from ECM in 2.2 
because it would make blocks easier among other great benefits.  Is this 
still a thought?  That would certainly make a new repo an attractive thing.


View raw message