cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ugo Cei <>
Subject Re: Getting an X from a FOM_X
Date Sun, 03 Aug 2003 21:30:27 GMT
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> You see... Here lies the problem: everything not wrapped in js_ should 
> not be accessible. See all those discussions on "less is more" and 
> "FOM". Before adding anything into the FOM (adding some new wrapper) 
> vote should take place. FOM was limited by design.
> Vadim

Oh yes, I see. In fact, I have solved the issue by "unwrapping" the 
o.a.c.e.Request in a Java method and haven't added anything to the FOM.

But now I have a need to add the "getRealPath" method to the context, 
only because Linotype uses it extensively and I wanted to port it to the 
FOM. Is there a particular reason why it shouldn't be there? Before I 
start a vote, I'd like to hear some opinions in this regard.


View raw message