Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 8931 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2003 09:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 8913 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 09:45:30 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 09:45:30 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 6405FC4F74 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:45:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.43]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003072911454016:1233 ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:45:40 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Discussion of Cocoon TLP Guidelines Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:47:41 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3F2638E3.4080403@outerthought.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 29.07.2003 11:45:40, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 29.07.2003 11:45:41, Serialize complete at 29.07.2003 11:45:41 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Steven Noels wrote: > Please take your time reading through it, it ain't as bad as it looks > like, and it concerns you: developers & contributors of the Cocoon > project(s). And let's try and keep this as lightweight as feasible. > I read most of it and I think it's a very good start. I have two notes: - we don't have an announcement mailing list. Ok, we can either drop this paragraph or think about creating such a list. - the part about the release is not the way we currently do the releases Here we have to decide if we want to stick to our "more lazy" approach of releases or if we want to adopt a more formal but improved way of releasing Cocoon. Carsten