Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72684 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2003 13:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72500 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2003 13:40:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2003 13:40:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 13813 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2003 13:40:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (stefano@127.0.0.1) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2003 13:40:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:40:27 -0500 Subject: Re: New JDK available Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Stefano Mazzocchi To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <005f01c351d8$5d0facc0$c801a8c0@deepford> Message-Id: <62DFCCA4-BDDC-11D7-9869-000393D2CB02@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thursday, Jul 24, 2003, at 06:40 America/Guayaquil, Christoph Gaffga wrote: > Hi, > we are running Cocoon 2.1m3 on JDK 1.2 > with -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC > -Xmx120 > 0m -Xms1200m and we see only little perfomance increase. But there is > something I read in the java perfomance docs, they say: Don't use > object > pools, because the internal garbagge collection ist better and does it > faster, also with overhead of creating an new instance. Is this true > for > cocoon? > find it out yourself by turning the max-pool values to 0 in the sitemap. i would very happy to know if the above is true myself. -- Stefano.