Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 14892 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2003 15:41:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 14879 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 15:41:44 -0000 Received: from out001pub.verizon.net (HELO out001.verizon.net) (206.46.170.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 15:41:44 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([139.85.116.155]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030729154147.LNWL12592.out001.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:41:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3F2695BA.20109@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:41:46 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Treeprocessor bug with map:resource and views? References: <3F267E82.7030404@verizon.net> <3F268FFD.8090504@leverageweb.com> In-Reply-To: <3F268FFD.8090504@leverageweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [139.85.116.155] at Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:41:46 -0500 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Geoff Howard wrote: > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> Check out the samples. Most of them work ok, with the exception of >> i18n samles -- click on content view or links view and see the >> results. i18n samples use aggregation and resources in the sitemap >> with the label on one aggregated part. When this pipeline moved from >> the resource to the pipelines section everything seems to be working ok. >> >> This makes me think that there is a problem with resource handling >> and view labels in the tree processor. Anybody seen this issue already? > > > I don't have a running copy available ATM - can you describe the results > you're seeing? "content" returns untranslated (or broken in some other way) html instead of xml, "pretty-content" returns navigation and empty body. Links view returns same as "content" or just plain result, not sure. > I've noticed a problem with those links that I think is > more due to the sitemap/xsl design that handles them and am wondering > if we're seeing the same thing. Change to the sitemap (get rid of map:resource) fixes the issue meaning that xsl is not at fault. Vadim