Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68276 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2003 14:47:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68184 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2003 14:47:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cbim.it) (212.131.130.82) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2003 14:47:01 -0000 Received: from cuprouter.cbim.it (cuprouter.cbim.it [192.168.4.10]) by mail.cbim.it (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h63F9RG12113 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:09:27 +0200 Received: from cbim.it (caterina.cbim.it [192.168.4.42]) by cuprouter.cbim.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11664 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:47:21 +0200 Message-ID: <3F04422C.6030803@cbim.it> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 16:48:12 +0200 From: Ugo Cei Organization: C.B.I.M. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Flow] Do we allow actions to wrap call functions in the sitemap? References: <001301c3414f$82e3b9d0$1e01a8c0@WRPO> <3F041CB9.80802@verizon.net> <3F041EE1.4010401@cbim.it> <3F0423ED.9020707@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <3F0423ED.9020707@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Hm. Ain't it obvious? :) > Ok, if not: First sample: pipeline conditionally (depending on result of > action) consists from single map:call. Second: pipeline unconditionally > (always) consist from single map:call. That's the same as good'ol: Hmmm, maybe my question was a bit too terse ;-). I actually meant: how can you *use* those pipelines if you don't have a matcher? Sorry if this is a FAQ or a dumb question. Ugo -- Ugo Cei - http://www.beblogging.com/blog/