Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 87752 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2003 12:15:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 87729 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 12:15:09 -0000 Received: from anchor-post-39.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.80) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 12:15:09 -0000 Received: from media.demon.co.uk ([80.177.14.141]) by anchor-post-39.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 19clBd-0004ZV-0U for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:15:09 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:15:07 +0100 Subject: Re: Woody or JXForms? + hibernate or * ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jeremy Quinn To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <41366.10.0.0.5.1058302397.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Message-Id: <236AB8A8-B787-11D7-943E-0003935AD2EE@media.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 09:53 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Hi: > > I want to try some of the new spectacular technologies sported in > Cocoon :) > I also will play with persistent data. The idea is to create a simple > database application using postgres as storage of persistent data. > > After checking all the docs. For forms: I cannot decide between JXForms > and Woody? Please I need an advise from the gurus in forms. I have not tried Woody (Sorry Bruno). I did however decide quite early on to use JXTemplate rather than JXForm as I found I was constantly having to work around stuff in JXForm that did not suit my approach. JXForm is particularly good at the multi-page wizard-type scenario, if your needs are different, you may find it too restrictive. This is not a criticism though!!! > For the object-database mapping is suggested Hibernate. > > I am still trying to find other ways similars to Hibernate since it > looks > like Hibernate is not a favorite player because of his LGPL license. :( Yea, I know, it is a shame, but we do have a workaround now, in terms of the independant project repository at cocoondev.org, which could legitimately be used for blocks that contain LGPL code. > I know there is a jakarta project related to database stuff. DBCP is > just > a Database connection pool. but, I went straight for Hibernate and did not even investigate the Apache stuff I am afraid. I just took the word of some peers who said, Hibernate is cool and easy. regards Jeremy