Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68626 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2003 19:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 68610 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 19:46:08 -0000 Received: from ns1.solarwinds.com (64.114.167.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 19:46:08 -0000 Received: from jdmobile (h24-65-166-210.nb.shawcable.net [24.65.166.210]) by ns1.solarwinds.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h6TJkB3R024230 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:46:11 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <046401c35612$43ef1d50$3c01a8c0@jdmobile> From: "JD Daniels" To: References: <20030729074935.GA7955@mysza.ekom.net.pl> <36563.10.0.0.5.1059467194.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> <03da01c355f1$23f9f950$3c01a8c0@jdmobile> <20030729180206.GA15030@mysza.ekom.net.pl> Subject: Re: Hibernate vs. OJB Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:44:53 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leszek Gawron" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:02 AM Subject: Re: Hibernate vs. OJB > 2. The OJB tutorial (IBM site) states that it is difficut to use it with IDEs > as it enables persistence to classes by modyfying the .class files. Eclipse > would go crazy I think. Second thing is that this approach isn't quite > elegant.. > This is only how LIBeLIS LiDO implements it (Which is what is used in the IBM tut) - Not OJB The Key to usefulness here is in the JDO api http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial4.html <-- No Mention of modifying .class files. I am going at this right now, and could be comlpetely wrong JD