Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 43119 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2003 06:56:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 43039 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 06:56:15 -0000 Received: from imap.gmx.net (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 06:56:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 16797 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Jul 2003 06:56:26 -0000 Received: from chello062178239020.5.15.vie.surfer.at (EHLO WRPO) (62.178.239.20) by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 08:56:26 +0200 Reply-To: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Reinhard_P=F6tz?= To: Subject: RE: CastorTransformer and CastorSourceConverter Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 08:56:37 +0200 Message-ID: <000701c34b67$6772fe50$1e01a8c0@WRPO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: Carsten Ziegeler > Reinhard P=F6tz wrote: > > > > In the scratchpad we have a CastorTransformer. I'm not sure but I=20 > > think that it is a rather long time there. Is it in use and=20 > stable and=20 > > is it time to move it in the main trunk or can we remove it. > > > > I also found a CastorSourceConverter in the portal=20 > framework. What are=20 > > the differences? Can they be unified? > > > I don't now the CastorTransformer, but the=20 > CastorSourceConverter. The converter is an avalon component=20 > that "converts" io streams from and to java objects. So, you=20 > can read an xml file using castor and get the mapped objects=20 > and vice versa. I guess, this is a more general approach then=20 > the transformer. >=20 > In general, I guess as well that they can somehow be unified,=20 > e.g. the transformer could use the source converter. I think=20 > there is also a patch for the transformer in bugzilla. Thank you Carsten! Cheers, Reinhard