cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@s-und-n.de>
Subject RE: [RT] Less is More, Finite State Machines and Balkanization
Date Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:31:08 GMT
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> >I think, for cocoon 2.2 with the "real blocks" we need to think about our
> >cvs strategy anyway. Currently, we agreed to create a new cvs repository
> >for each new major version, so we would have a cocoon-2.2 repository.
> >
>
> Why not 2.1.1? What change *requires* version bump to 2.2?

Good question. I expect that blocks required some changes in the core
of cocoon, so the next version with blocks is not only a maintainance
release, therefore a major version change.
Minor version changes are intended usually only for bug-fixing.

> Same repository will be used then, same blocks directories. IIRC,
> directory layout for the "fake blocks" was made specifically to enable
> "real blocks" without cvs restructuring. Meaning, we can develop "real
> blocks" in 2.1 CVS and release as 2.1.1 or 2.1.2 or whatever/whenever it
> will be.

Ok, I only made the assumption that we will do blocks for 2.2; we haven't
spoken about it in detail. If we decide to implement blocks in 2.1.x, it's
ok for me.
Whatever we choose we have to get to consensus very soon now.

Carsten


Mime
View raw message