cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Oliver <>
Subject Re: [RT] Generalizing the flow
Date Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:52:13 GMT
Sylvain Wallez wrote:

> Christopher Oliver wrote:
>> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>> These somewhat minor changes will allow a greater variety of 
>>> implementations of the Cocoon flow layer. And this is not only for 
>>> the technical beauty of it, as there are a number of good reasons 
>>> why we may want alternate implementations :
>>> - some people (talking about personal experience with some 
>>> customers) don't want to write their controller in JavaScript. They 
>>> want it in Java. Although a continuation-enabled Java is not yet 
>>> available, solutions exist to write this using plain old Java. 
>> Sorry, but it's already been demonstrated that a Java flow 
>> implementation is possible without any of these changes.
> Yeah, I know this. The Java I'm referring to is neither ATCT nor 
> something based on Brakes, but "plain old Java" without any special 
> feature.
> Sylvain
Then I don't undertand what you're talking about. It is not possible to 
provide a "flow implementation" in the sense that I understand it in 
"plain old Java". But I'm also not interested in pursuing this 
discussion any further. There's a lot of work still to be done on the 
current flow implementation, and what time I have I plan to spend on that..

View raw message