cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Portier <...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Generalizing the flow
Date Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:48:38 GMT


Christopher Oliver wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> 
>> These somewhat minor changes will allow a greater variety of 
>> implementations of the Cocoon flow layer. And this is not only for the 
>> technical beauty of it, as there are a number of good reasons why we 
>> may want alternate implementations :
>> - some people (talking about personal experience with some customers) 
>> don't want to write their controller in JavaScript. They want it in 
>> Java. Although a continuation-enabled Java is not yet available, 
>> solutions exist to write this using plain old Java. 
> 
> 
> Sorry, but it's already been demonstrated that a Java flow 
> implementation is possible without any of these changes.
> 

I think you mean a Java 'continuations' implementation?

also: from the opposite angle: which proposed changes are 
limiting the flow so it could no longer do what it does?

>>
>> - some applications (this is Marc's case) must use an existing flow 
>> controller and so can't use the JS implementations.
> 
> 
> What exactly is "Marc's case"? I read his wiki and I have to admit I 
> don't understand what he's talking about.
> 
> Chris
> 

regards,
-marc=
-- 
Marc Portier                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at              http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/
mpo@outerthought.org                              mpo@apache.org


Mime
View raw message