cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Dumon <>
Subject Re: [RT] New Input for woody
Date Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:30:11 GMT
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 17:25, Marc Portier wrote:
> As I see it now, the integration is not trivial (but possible)
> Your bean seems to provide an alternative to the declarative 
> woody-widget tree (form-model)
> We could argue about the woody-widget tree being the real CORE of 
> woody, so the 'not trivial' gets to have some meaning I guess :-)
> 'Integration' then becomes making the form-model pluggable which 
>   would come down to
> 1/ making the woody-template-transformer can pull out the values 
> using jxpath rather then using the widget API
> 2/ and the other way around the form.process(request) needs to 
> evolve to Dywel.process(bean-or-widgetTree, request); which could 
> again use some jxpath-like approach to perform its setValues...
> not trivial, maybe possible, useful?

_very_ quick skim-read, but: didn't you just reinvent XMLForm?

Bruno Dumon                   
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center                

View raw message