cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Revisiting Woody's form definition
Date Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:17:30 GMT
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 18:31, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:23, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> >>As for disposal, the TreeProcessor maintains a list of all Disposable 
> >>nodes created by the builders that are disposed when the sitemap itself 
> >>is disposed (BTW, thanks Carsten for finding that nodes should be 
> >>disposed in reverse order !)
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >The problem I saw with disposal was related to form-instances (more the
> >when than the how), but now I realize it's probably only the *Definition
> >objects that would need to become components, no?
> >  
> >
> 
> Do you mean that form instances can be stored in the session or in a 
> continuation, thus having a non-predictible disposal time ?

Yes. The current flow examples already work in this way.

>  You are 
> probably right. This means instances should delegate all their 
> component-related behaviour to their definition. I was bit surprised at 
> first by the backwards relation from the instance to its definition, but 
> it may make sense after all for this purpose.

Yeah, it's full of suprises. Be prepared.

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org                          bruno@apache.org


Mime
View raw message