cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Pötz <reinhard_po...@gmx.net>
Subject RE: Woody-flow to FOM migration question
Date Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:23:15 GMT


> I wasn't aware of the status of Environment. It's there 
> simply because 
> it was in the original flow implementation. It should be easy 
> enough to 
> only expose the features of Environment that are needed ( 
> getURIPrefix() 
> and getObjectModel()) rather than the entire object. I don't think 
> FOM_JavaScriptInterpreter should be exposed either. I'll try to make 
> these changes.

I don't think it is the best idea to make the object model available in
the flow. It would be better to provide it in the Context. IIRC it was
Sylvain and Carsten who told me that we already agreed on this but it
has not been implemented yet. Maybe this is a good reason ... ;-)

Cheers,
Reinhard


Mime
View raw message