Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 68278 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2003 10:11:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 68263 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 10:11:51 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 10:11:51 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 9932F9ADB8 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6209E770 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:11:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.36]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003061012115769:9906 ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:11:57 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: [BUG]: Endless recursion in source resolving Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:13:31 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1055238416.2401.288.camel@yum.ot> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 10.06.2003 12:11:57, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 10.06.2003 12:12:00, Serialize complete at 10.06.2003 12:12:00 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bruno Dumon wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 11:16, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Bruno Dumon wrote: > > > > > > Yep, after trying it out I saw it too. > > > > > > Anybody working on this already? (or can I do it?) > > > > > No, I'm not :) so: go for it ;) > > > > done :-) > Yes, it works now! Thanks Carsten