Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 3773 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2003 11:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 3760 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 11:58:34 -0000 Received: from dobit2.ugent.be (HELO dobit2.rug.ac.be) (157.193.42.8) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 11:58:34 -0000 Received: from allserv.UGent.be (allserv.ugent.be [157.193.40.42]) by dobit2.rug.ac.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h56BwXYJ019285 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:58:33 +0200 (MEST) Received: from otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (otsrv1.iic.ugent.be [157.193.121.51]) by allserv.UGent.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h56BwXtp023096 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:58:33 +0200 (MEST) Received: from outerthought.org (host104 [192.168.123.104]) by otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h56BwXx31518 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:58:33 +0200 Message-ID: <3EE081E9.6020907@outerthought.org> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 13:58:33 +0200 From: Steven Noels Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] XML websites] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Anyone heard about this already? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML websites Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:14:19 -0700 From: Erik Bruchez To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org References: <003e01c329be$43400520$7a9fe50c@attbi.com> Dennis, This is exactly what our framework, OXF allows you to do: build Web applications using 100% XML-based technologies. Some people mentioned Cocoon: if that helps, you can see OXF as a better Cocoon (this being said, OXF does not use a single line of Cocoon source code). [snip] But XML has its place in Web applications. In OXF, you can use it for the application workflow, data access, business logic, and, very importantly, for the presentation layer. We support XSLT, WXS, Relax NG, XSLT 1.0, the latest draft of XSLT 2.0 (thanks Michael Kay and Saxon 7!), a server-side subset of XForms, XUpdate, and XPL, our XML components orchestration language. OXF is free for non-commercial use. For more information, see: http://www.orbeon.com/oxf/ For a list of features in the upcoming 2.0: http://www.orbeon.com/oxf/upcoming-release -Erik Dennis D. wrote: > Hello: > I have a database application programming background (Oracle SQL+, > dbase, MS Access), and have been studying XML for awhile (6 > months+). I've seen several case studies (especially at Microsoft) > using XML as a legacy database interface, and other applications > where XML is being implemented using various application languages. > > What I haven't seen is a true XML website; a model. If XML > technology is set to become the pervasive programming language of > webservers everywhere, then where are the websites? I've seen some > examples of web 'pages' using XHTML. Microsoft has enabled MSXML in > their browsers, yet I don't see it being used in public websites in > the programming code. In fact, Microsoft seems to be using > JavaScript (which was originally a Netscape product as you know), > and using XML as a database application to build their website. IBM > is using an HTML document on it's homepage, but at least it declares > a DOCTYPE and references a dtd called ibmxhtml1. W3 is using XHTML1 > strict. > > Where is XML in this? Where are the true XML websites, and the > browser clients that display them? > > Why do I ask? I've been building websites for about 7 years (as a > hobby). Currently, I have single website of a couple hundred pages, > which includes an MS Access database and a message board (written in > ASP). I am familiar with CSS, JavaScript, and some other languages > which I could combine to construct a website. I want to re-write it > using the latest and greatest technology available. I thought that > would be XML. Turns out that XHTML is the latest and greatest. It is > an interim solution. Worse, it involves a complex conversion process > to yield (I suspect) the XHTML pages. Do you know of any true XML > websites? I'm sort of at a loss about where I should be going with > this. I've taken my site down, studied the content, and I'm left > with the builders dilemma; how to redress the architecture > (languages, db's, etc.). As a website builder, what model should I > be looking toward; Microsoft, IBM, W3C and it's Amaya client? > > Respectfully, > > Dennis Dickens, > Lakewood, WA, USA -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org