Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 58643 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2003 17:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 58630 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 17:17:26 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2003 17:17:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 12975 invoked by uid 50); 14 Jun 2003 17:19:45 -0000 Date: 14 Jun 2003 17:19:45 -0000 Message-ID: <20030614171945.12974.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6879] - [PATCH] Cache improvement using ESI invalidation protocol X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6879 [PATCH] Cache improvement using ESI invalidation protocol javageoff@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From javageoff@yahoo.com 2003-06-14 17:19 ------- Marcelo, I'm sorry for the long delay in resolving this patch. In my opinion there were three factors: the refactoring of several cocoon internal API's that affected the technical viability of the patch, a lack of interest among developers because of the lack of general applicability, and some questions over the specific technical solution. Because of these three I'm marking it WONTFIX. Still, I think the issue of external invalidation of cached items is a need in Cocoon and would love to see the problem solved. I am beginning some scratchpad work on a solution that may be general enough to apply to your specific needs - of course you're more than welcome to participate if you still have interest. Geoff Howard