Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24283 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2003 07:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24255 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 07:37:13 -0000 Received: from parmenides.zen.co.uk (212.23.8.69) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 07:37:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 27333 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 07:37:24 -0000 Received: from protagoras.zen.co.uk (212.23.8.61) by parmenides.zen.co.uk with QMQP; 16 Jun 2003 07:37:24 -0000 Received: from dsl-62-3-64-112.zen.co.uk (HELO wotcha) (62.3.64.112) by protagoras.zen.co.uk with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 07:37:24 -0000 X-Zen-Trace: 62.3.64.112 From: "Christopher Watson" To: Subject: RE: [vote] FOM design methodology Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:39:08 +0100 Message-ID: <003501c333da$5f050f00$0101010a@paramita.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <028401c3342a$189d5220$0200a8c0@your12na6ujjvt> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Culshaw [mailto:tony@cultech.com.au] > Sent: 16 June 2003 18:10 > To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org > Subject: Re: [vote] FOM design methodology > > > I've considered using in in the past for a project and then > rejected it as being in the "api too unstable" basket. Hah! I'm already using albeit a tiny example of it in production. > > Anything that ensures code that I cut now won't break later > and has more of a future gets my vote. > > [+1] small to big. > > [-1] big to small. > So likewise to save me future work! [+1] small to big. [-1] big to small. Christopher