AC> > Bruno?
BD> You expect me to give my blessing or so? I don't really care that much
BD> about it all. Arguments 2 and 3 are reasonable, and certainly
BD> have their uses.
You dropped the question (and I had my doubts too), so I tried to sum up the pro's and asked
for your opinion. Blessing should be left over to others ;-)
BD> What I wanted to avoid though is that problems with the normal HTML
BD> serializer (like the namespace or textarea problem) would be hidden by
BD> jtidy, and that users would be pointed to the tidyserializer as the
BD> solution for these problems. One should not forget the performance
BD> impact of the tidyserializer: it uses an additional thread and has to
BD> reparse the serialized output.
I agree completely. It should be clear that it might not be the solution to all problems.
TK> BTW: You could provide CHTML rendering for the cocoon sample.
Yes, that would be fun. I will. But I might need the TidySerializer for that.. ;)
Thanks for the TidySerializer.
Regards, Arje
|