Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-dev-return-41987-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2907 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2003 01:18:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2891 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 01:18:29 -0000
Received: from main.gmane.org (80.91.224.249)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2003 01:18:29 -0000
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19GTqA-0003Pl-00
	for <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>; Fri, 16 May 2003 03:16:54 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19GTq9-0003Pb-00
	for <gmane-text-xml-cocoon-devel@m.gmane.org>;
 Fri, 16 May 2003 03:16:53 +0200
From: Stefano Mazzocchi <stefano@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Regarding Excalibur XMLUtil and Store
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:19:01 -0500
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <ba1e64$c91$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <3EC191E2.70001@apache.org>
 <LKENJPKDAIKAPKHEOCMMEEHADJAA.cziegeler@s-und-n.de>
 <3EC264D3.2010209@apache.org> <3EC265FE.9090802@anyware-tech.com>
 <b9tpqb$ite$1@main.gmane.org> <3EC27040.5050700@verizon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <3EC27040.5050700@verizon.net>
Sender: news <news@main.gmane.org>
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

on 5/14/03 11:35 AM Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> 
> 
>>Ah, some people would be happy to hear that we now both fully agree
>>that, with the advent of flow and JX/XSLT/XQuery-based templating, the
>>use of XSP should be dicouradged and should be moved into a block in the
>>future ;-)
>>
> 
> 
> <sob> I'll miss 'em... </sob>  Block is a good idea though.

nono, nothing to miss: moving into a block means "refactoring", not
"removal".

Also "discouradged" means: there are better ways to achieve the same
exact thing. But there will be ways were XSP make sense and for that
reason, will be continued to be supported for a long while I would guess
(that is, as long as somebody cares for it).

-- 
Stefano.