Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 40707 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2003 11:25:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 40637 invoked from network); 20 May 2003 11:25:43 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2003 11:25:43 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id D1FA0AC652 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB6BA9CF4 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.34]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003052013254172:176579 ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:25:41 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: M2 is build Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:27:03 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 20.05.2003 13:25:41, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 20.05.2003 13:25:42, Serialize complete at 20.05.2003 13:25:42 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > "Carsten Ziegeler" wrote: > > > Now we should wait 24hours for the mirros and I will announce > > the release tomorrow. > > You can actually check the status of the mirrors here > > > > (quite nice to know what's the weather like out there) > Really nice link! > > However, we should of course still coordinate the releases and > > I would like to still have one single person doing this and only > > if this person is not able to do so, others can step in. > > Otherwise we might get uncoordinated releases. What do you think? > > +1... :-) Power to Carsten! :-) > Thanks! (And I will never post any pictures from you in some mailing list, promised :-) ) Carsten