Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-dev-return-41992-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 63590 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2003 02:47:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 63573 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 02:47:30 -0000
Received: from pop015pub.verizon.net (HELO pop015.verizon.net)
 (206.46.170.172)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2003 02:47:30 -0000
Received: from verizon.net ([141.156.213.191]) by pop015.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP
          id <20030516024739.UTJQ17297.pop015.verizon.net@verizon.net>
          for <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 21:47:39 -0500
Message-ID: <3EC45149.5050200@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:47:37 -0400
From: Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building Cocoon 2.1 on Windows 98
References: <CAEFLDPFNJFPMBLBKFLOEEEHCFAA.cocoon@leverageweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEFLDPFNJFPMBLBKFLOEEEHCFAA.cocoon@leverageweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop015.verizon.net from
 [141.156.213.191] at Thu, 15 May 2003 21:47:39 -0500
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Geoff Howard wrote:

>>Pierrick Brihaye wrote:
>>    
>>
>
><snip/>
>
>  
>
>>>The patch is *very* tricky and the design could certainly be 
>>>      
>>>
>>improved but...
>>    
>>
>>>it works :-)
>>>      
>>>
>>Oh!!! my!!! god!!!
>>
>>Does anybody has any objections against including this... hm... 
>>"workaround"?
>>    
>>
>
>Uh, is there any way for a mere mortal to see what senvar is doing??  
>

If you are really into it... ;-)
http://www.bmtmicro.com/BMTCatalog/multipleos/hiew.html
(quick help: type "hiewdemo.exe SENVAR.COM", then press F4, select "Decode")


>Won't people be concerned about this black box that may be innocent, 
>but looks evil?  Does this senvar bit exist in another form that could 
>be included in cvs, or merely provided as a link for people who want 
>to build under win98 (which seems to be a short list, presumably getting 
>shorter)?
>

Yeah, we can just sit and wait and see how Win9x users are disappearing 
by itself ... ;-)

Vadim